Bedford, TX
Cloud PBX Phone System for Bedford TX Medical Practices
A Bedford medical practice comparing phone systems usually compares a monthly quote against a monthly bill. That comparison is wrong in both directions, and correcting it takes about an hour.
Book a Demo
It is wrong on the current side because a practice's telephone spending is scattered across several bills approved by different people at different times. It is wrong on the new side because a per-user figure is not the same as what the practice will actually pay.
Cleod9 provides cloud communication for Dallas-Fort Worth businesses. This page is about the arithmetic and the contract questions, which are the parts of a phone decision that outlast whichever features looked good in a demonstration.
Find everything the practice currently pays
Practices routinely find two or three line items they had forgotten, and the total is generally higher than the number anybody would have quoted from memory.
The main telephone service bill, including line charges and long distance.
A separate bill for the fax line, which in many practices sits with a different provider entirely.
The maintenance contract on the equipment in the closet, which is frequently separate from both the equipment and the service.
A lease on that equipment, if it was not purchased outright.
The answering service, if the practice uses one for after hours.
Anything paid to a consultant or an installer when something needs changing.
Licenses for whatever the practice uses today for video meetings and staff messaging.
Any charge associated with appointment reminder messaging, if that runs through a separate vendor.
Add them up over twelve months rather than one, because several of these are annual and would otherwise be missed. That figure is the honest baseline.
Ask what is included, item by item
A quoted price per user is a starting point rather than an answer, and the difference between the two is where budgets go wrong.
Ask specifically about each of these: how many numbers are included and what an additional one costs; whether every staff member needs a paid seat or whether some roles do not; whether call recording is included and whether its storage is; whether transcription is included; whether business texting is included and how volume affects it; whether video is included; and whether integrations carry a separate charge.
Then ask for the total at the practice's current headcount and at fifty percent more. A clinic that adds a provider and two staff should not be surprised by the bill, and the shape of the increase matters as much as the amount.
Ask what happens with a second location. Some arrangements treat it as a separate account and some do not, and a practice considering a satellite in the next two years should know which before signing.
The one-time costs that belong in the comparison
These do not recur, and leaving them out makes the first year look better than it will be.
Handsets, where existing ones cannot be reused. Ask what the practice's specific models support rather than accepting a general answer, since this can swing the first-year figure noticeably.
Any wiring work, particularly where desks are currently on wifi and should be on a cable.
A router replacement, if the current one has been in the closet since before anybody at the practice arrived.
The overlap month during porting, where the practice pays both providers. That is not waste; it is what protects the practice's numbers, and it belongs in the budget rather than in a surprise.
The costs that are not on any bill
Worth adding to the comparison even though nobody invoices for them, because they are frequently larger than the line items.
Time spent waiting for changes. A practice that needs a support ticket to change holiday hours or an on-call rotation is paying in delay, and paying again when it stops making changes and works around the system instead.
Calls that end before anybody answers. Most practices have never counted these and they do not appear anywhere, but a patient who rings during the lunch hour and hangs up is a real loss, and one that a system with proper overflow coverage recovers.
Staff time spent walking to find people, which internal reachability reduces, and staff time spent on hold with insurers, which a headset makes tolerable.
Days lost to outages. If the routing logic sits in the building, an internet or power failure means the phones simply do not work; if it sits outside, calls can be sent to mobile devices provided the path was configured in advance.
Contract questions to settle before signing
Four, and they are easier to ask now than to raise later.
What is the term, and what happens at the end of it? Automatic renewal is common and the notice period is the part worth reading.
What does leaving look like? Numbers port out because local number portability is a federal requirement. Recordings, transcripts and message history are a contract matter, and the practice should know the format, the timeline and the cost of getting them.
What are the support arrangements? Cleod9 is a Dallas-Fort Worth provider supporting its own customers, which for a Bedford practice means dealing with somebody in the same metro rather than a distant ticket queue, and it is worth confirming what that looks like in practice.
What is committed about availability, and what happens when something goes wrong? A practice that cannot take calls is a practice that cannot function, and the answer should be specific rather than reassuring.
The data questions, which are also contract questions
Call recording runs automatically on the platform, so these belong in the same conversation as price.
Where are recordings, transcripts and message content stored? What is the default retention period, and can the practice set its own? Can a specific record be deleted on request? Who can access recordings, and how is that controlled?
Get the answers in writing and keep them with the practice's other records policies. A practice subject to health information rules should have its own compliance advisor review both the vendor's answers and the practice's own decisions about what may be captured, before go-live rather than after. This page is operational guidance and not legal or medical advice.
Access is governed by the access control list, which means it is a configuration decision rather than something inherited. Configure it deliberately at go-live, because a default is almost always broader than a practice would choose.
The requirements that are not negotiable
Two federal rules apply to any multi-line telephone system, and they belong on the procurement checklist rather than being discovered during installation.
Kari's Law requires that a person can dial 911 directly without first dialing a prefix to reach an outside line, and that the system notifies a central point on site when a 911 call is placed. In a clinic that means somebody at the front desk knows an emergency call was made from a treatment room.
The RAY BAUM'S Act addresses dispatchable location: the information sent with a 911 call must be specific enough for responders to find the caller. For fixed devices in a multi-line system the relevant compliance date was January 6, 2021, and for non-fixed devices and certain other configurations it was January 6, 2022.
Ask how location is registered for each device, how it is kept current when a phone moves between rooms, and confirm it at go-live rather than accepting the answer.
What the practice gets that it does not have now
A cost comparison that only counts what is being replaced undersells the decision, so it is worth listing what is added.
Extensions follow people rather than desks, so a biller working from home and a provider at a second location are on the same internal numbers colleagues already dial, and outbound calls show the practice's number rather than a personal one.
The practice administers its own rules in a browser. Holiday hours, an on-call change, a closure message during an ice storm; minutes rather than a ticket, made by whoever knows about it.
The AI Voice Concierge can cover the hours and the windows nobody can staff. It answers, asks the questions the practice defined, books where the practice's rules allow, captures requests, and transfers to a person. The boundaries are firm: no assessment of symptoms, no advice about medications, no view on whether something can wait, and the greeting tells anyone facing an emergency to hang up and dial 911 before any other question. Have a clinician review the script.
Business texting, video meetings and x-bees team messaging with AI transcription and summaries are part of the platform, which is why the comparison should include whatever the practice pays for those today.
Common questions
Is a cloud system cheaper?
Frequently, and the honest answer depends on what the practice is currently paying across all those bills. The comparison is worth doing properly rather than assuming in either direction.
Do we keep our numbers?
Yes. Number portability is a federal requirement. Keep the old service active until the port completes and test before closing anything, since a number released by cancellation may not be recoverable.
What about the fax number?
Treat it as a first-class item. A practice that loses inbound faxing loses referrals and results, so confirm how faxing works on the platform before the port date.
How long is the commitment?
Ask, and ask what happens at renewal. The notice period is the part most worth reading.
Building the comparison so it survives scrutiny
In most practices this decision has to be explained to somebody: a physician owner, a partner, an administrator who signs the checks. A comparison that is a single pair of numbers invites argument; one that shows its working does not.
Lay it out over three years rather than one. Year one carries the one-time costs and looks worse than the steady state; years two and three show what the practice is actually committing to. A decision argued on year one alone usually gets made for the wrong reason in either direction.
Separate the like-for-like part from the added part. What the practice pays today for telephone service, faxing, maintenance and answering compared against the equivalent on the new platform is the honest replacement comparison. Video, texting, team messaging and the Concierge are additions, and they should be counted as either replacing something the practice already licenses or as a new capability worth a stated amount.
Show the volume sensitivity. If the practice adds a provider, what changes? If call volume doubles during a busy season, does the cost move? A comparison that answers those two questions preempts the objection that usually arrives late in the conversation.
And name the assumptions rather than burying them. The number of paid seats, the retention period chosen for recordings, whether existing handsets are reused. Each of those is a judgment, and an owner who can see them is far more comfortable than one who is handed a total.
What to have ready before the quote
A vendor can only price accurately against real information, and a practice that arrives with it gets a firmer number and fewer surprises later.
The number inventory: main line, direct lines, fax, and anything printed on old materials that still routes somewhere. Practices consistently discover during a migration that they own more numbers than they knew.
The headcount by role, including part-time staff and anybody who covers occasionally, since who needs a seat is a real variable in the price.
The current internet service and its upload speed, taken from the bill rather than from memory, plus whether desks are wired or on wifi.
The list of lines that are not telephones. Alarm systems, elevators and certain equipment use telephone lines with their own requirements, and they are not handled like a business line.
A copy of the current customer service record from the existing provider, which is what the port paperwork has to match. A practice that moved suites and never updated the carrier's records will find that out during the port rather than before it.
Half a day to assemble all of that, and it removes most of the delay and most of the revised quotes from the project.
A note on the compliance question
Practices ask this early, so here is the position in plain terms.
Cleod9 can enter into a business associate agreement by way of Wildix, the platform behind the service, and that agreement reaches voice, voicemail, video, recording and transcription but not SMS. The platform itself has been audited to SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2, encrypts call and video media in transit, and holds each customer's system separately in AWS.
What that does is remove the vendor as an open question. What it does not do is make any practice compliant on its own. Compliance is a property of the whole arrangement, including decisions the practice makes about access, retention, training, documentation and the physical spaces where calls are taken.
Treat the agreement as the first item on the list rather than the whole list, and take the rest of the list to whoever advises the practice on privacy.
Talking to Cleod9
The platform is described on the Cleod9 services page, and the useful conversation starts from the practice's own numbers rather than from a price list.
Bring the twelve-month total of everything the practice currently pays, across every bill. With that in hand the discussion is a comparison rather than a quote, and the practice can tell whether it is actually saving money or simply moving it.